It would be true to form.
The ex-agent told the FBI that they were aware of Clinton or her aides ‘removing lamps and furniture from the State Department which were transported to her residence in Washington, D.C.’
The female agent did not know whether the items were returned, the FBI noted.
The claim is particularly resonant for the Clintons, who left the White House with massive amounts of furniture and other items which they then either returned – including sofas, a chair, and an ottoman – or paid for.
In total they declared $190,000 in gifts as they left the White House, but ended up paying $86,000 in cash and handing back $48,000 worth of items – after public outrage at what they had done.
The State Department denied the ex-agent’s allegation, saying it was ‘not true’ and that the items removed from the building had been paid for by the then Secretary of State.
Buying your own furniture must be for the little people.
“The State Department denied the ex-agent’s allegation, saying it was ‘not true’ and that the items removed from the building had been paid for by the then Secretary of State.
State Department deputy spokesperson Mark Toner said: ‘Secretary Clinton did not remove State Department furniture or other U.S. government property from the premises.
‘Secretary Clinton brought a small number of personal items – including lamps – from her personal residence to the State Department when she became Secretary, and she took those personal items with her when she departed.
‘An inventory of the Secretary’s office was conducted when she arrived at the Department and when she left. No State Department or U.S. government property was removed.’ “.
Looks like another foot-in-mouth moment for Kevin. Learn from it.
Nord,
Clintons stole furniture from White House.
Of course Department will deny her criminality, they are invested in proping up her political campaign.
This is same department that allowed her to criminally handle classified info for years!
Department credibility is zero.
And the same department that allowed Rice and Powell to do the same thing. Perhaps the state department has no credibility, but at least they are nonpartisan in their incompetence. Or do you feel a surge of “do as I say, not as I do” coming on again??
Rice or Powell are not running for president.
If they did that, it is just as wrong.
So it was OK for Rice and Powell to do it but not HRC? Same old hypocrisy from the Kevin.
And I know Rice and Powell aren’t running for president. Did you realize that Bill Clinton isn’t, either? Keep that in mind.
I guess you are part of that large % not proficient in reading.
Bill Clinton is in play because Hillary covers for his sexual harassing and assault behavior. Hillary’s insensitivity to women is at issue because she lets her predator husband run amock.
Rationalize it all you want, but Bill isn’t running for president. Talk about a low info voter…..