One has to wonder if such a warning will deter a single coffee drinker from drinking coffee. And if not, then what’s the point?
A Los Angeles judge has ruled that California law requires coffee companies to carry an ominous cancer warning label because of a chemical produced in the roasting process.
Elihu Berle, a superior court judge, wrote in a proposed ruling on Wednesday that Starbucks and other coffee companies failed to show that the threat from a chemical compound produced in the roasting process was insignificant.
A not-for-profit group had sued coffee roasters, distributors and retailers under a state law that requires warnings on a wide range of chemicals that can cause cancer. One of those chemicals is acrylamide, a carcinogen present in coffee.
Owen asks: …then what’s the point?
Oh, that’s easy: Ca$h. Boat loads of it.
These are the same ambulance chasers that sued McD’s and Burger King in 2002 over french fries.
“ Last year alone [2012], Wall Street Journal reports that $25.6 million in cash and prizes were handed out in 681 settlements. Lawyers took home 75% of it.“
Another reason to stay away from California.