Another victim of zero-tolerance.
Outrage was growing among members of Madison’s black community Thursday, a day after a black West High School security guard was fired for what he said was explicitly telling a student not to call him the N-word after the student repeatedly called him the slur.
Marlon Anderson’s Facebook post in which he describes his termination from the Madison School District after working there for 11 years generated hundreds of comments supporting the former school worker. Many derided the district’s zero-tolerance policy toward use of the slur by staff in any context.
Sorry. Context and nuance are no longer tolerated.
>Sorry. Context and nuance are no longer tolerated.
95 percent of the crap types into the form here by Jif and LeRoy prove that beyond all doubt.
Owen may need to edit this.
I thought context and nuance were still required if you were a member of an intersectional victim group. How are we going to ban all that Hollywood gangsta rap?
Context and nuance are no longer tolerated if you are perceived at bottom of victim scale, meaning male, white or Christian. If you are all 3, that is trifecta of doom when it comes to liberal mercy, forgiveness (if such a thing ever exists in liberalism), and tolerance.
Try that again j, you aren’t making any sense.
That’s it k, add your perpetual victimhood into a stew of religious persecution. But you are quick to call others snowflakes. Awful, just awful.
Note what is missing from Urinal’s story.
Nord,
I didn’t call anyone a snowflake.
So you now are saying a black security guard no longer has protected victimhood status like millionaire gansta rappers that throw N word around all the time?
Awful. Just awful.
k, you have called me a snowflake numerous times. And no, I won’t provide the quote.
And no I didn’t say that at all (see above). When something is so easily proven, why do you have to lie? Is it a pathology with you?
Nord,
Provide the quote.
So was this security guard unjustly fired without regard to his liberal intersectional victimhood, or not?
Why are some celebrated for using the N word and paid millions, while others get the shaft, like this poor guy?
k:
What part of, “And no, I won’t provide the quote” don’t you understand? Or is your memory so feeble that you truly don’t remember calling me (and others) snowflakes?
Personally I wouldn’t have fired Mr. Anderson. But I wasn’t there (nor were you), so I won’t make any further comment on the circumstances. Nor will I use such nonsensical gobbledegook as “liberal intersectional victimhood”.
Nord,
Let me put it this way. You are a liar.
Why is proof for everyone else but you?
k:
Nope. But you are forgetful, in a selective sorta way.
Since you never, ever provide proof, don’t you find it hypocritical to demand it of someone else? Or is hypocrisy part of your code of conduct?
I testified I have never called you that.
You said I did.
Ball is in your court to provide proof or apologize for your lie.
Remember k. I don’t apologize for your mistakes. Guess we are at a standoff.
Nord,
It is your mistake and civility demands you back your assertion with proof.
In a court of law you would be guilty of slander based on this evidence alone.
Ready to apologize for your slander?
“In a court of law you would be guilty of slander based on this evidence alone”
Really? That would be a fun trial. I’d love to see the transcript of your testimony. You do realize that you would be under oath, right?
It’s nice to see that the Madison School District is being mocked all over the country, with very few people coming to it’s defense.
The lack of common sense in Madison is overwhelming and this will cost the District plenty, both in money and in goodwill within the community.
For Kevin and Le Roi “I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries…”. Monty Python.
That seems to you 2.
And yet there are other circumstances where zero-tolerance is whole-heartedly cheered by the authoritarians.
jjf, care to give examples?
Looks like intersectional liberals in Madison have capitulated and given his job back.
Goes to prove, if you are part of the intersectional victim class, you can yell N-word anytime.
Disgusting that skin color, not your character, determines your fate in cases like this.
Liberalism makes me vomit.
Mar, I guess I’m thinking of the way that authoritarians implement laws or even try to enforce social norms, and don’t speak highly of nuance or variation. No matter how many times doctors testify that there are situations with the gravely ill where late-term babies endanger the mother’s life, you still have politicians today claiming that people can have a baby, take it home, and then decide to kill it.
Kevin, you keep using “intersectional” and I don’t think you know what it means.
Jjf,
You are woefully uninformed on the political correctness religion these days.
Keep asking questions like that and you will get your liberal card taken away.
Who exactly is at the intersection of what, in this context?
jjf, the abortion situation happens so I infrequently that most people would side with the mother.
But then, the other authoritarians go to the other extreme where the mother can have a hangnail and it will affect her well being and so she have an abortion.
jjf,
Here is a primer on intersectionality:
(How many victim groups do you belong to?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc7VUoytoU4
Try to keep up.
As is the case with most LeftyWankers, Jiffy makes a case about “killing the mom” without any substantive proof of any such possibilities.
Standard moral theo allows a physician to save the life of a mother even if the secondary effect is an abortion. Tubal pregnancies are the prime example here. But tubals are very rare, indeed.
Actual medical science also demonstrate that a baby can live ex-utero after only 5 months (or slightly less) gestation. MAR’s observation about ‘hangnails’ is correct; he could have added “psychiatric disorders” to the “just cause” list of made-up, fake, “reasons to kill.”
Dad29, heaven knows “substantive proof” wasn’t required when the politicians I mentioned claimed that people were allowed to kill babies after they’d taken them home. Of course tubal pregnancies are rare. That doesn’t seem to stop some lawmakers from attempting to make treatment impossible. “Actual medical science” and a doctor’s judgment also don’t seem to matter to many politicians who work very hard to make treatment impossible, all in the effort to please people like you.
jjf, you make a lot of accusations of unknown people. Can you name some of these people please?
Mar,
Jiffy is a monkey throwing poo everywhere.
Look at his question on intersectionality, it shows how woefully uninformed he is on topic at hand.
Kevin, I hope you understand that I do know what “intersectionality” is, and that I’m simply pointing out that you are using it so reflexively in contexts where it truly makes no sense in terms of the definition.
Mar, which accusations are you pointing at? The politicians who said people can take babies home and kill them with impunity? Have you not been reading the news lately?
>The politicians who said people can take babies home and kill them with impunity? Have you not been reading the news lately?
Hey Dummy…
>“By the way, it’s not live birth abortion, it’s not infanticide, it is murder if you take the baby home and kill the baby at home, it’s murder,” Walker said. “The same thing is true at the hospital.”
Whoops, that’s at the bottom of your linked article from HuffPost, the biggest, most disgusting purveyor of lies on the internet.
So, did you really link to Scott Walker’s quotes as support for your argument, when he closed with EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE? I had hoped you were growing up, but you’re actually regressing.
Jiffy,
Then explain yourself. This is not about zero tolerance for N-word, but whether someone who is black can say it….or be punished for saying it.
If you are white, much, much, different rules apply. (Even if the white person was “down with black/hip hop culture”)
This story is the total embodiment of disgusting liberal intersectionality!
Doesn’t this story embarrass the liberalism right out of you? It should.
Jason, here’s a tweet from Trump:
Tell me how you think the GOP wasn’t trying to suggest that people are killing their children after they’ve been delivered.
You’re oppressed as a white man, hmm, Kevin? Tell me more.
Intersectionalism… which two group memberships are intersecting here and how is that person being oppressed?
Here’s another, Jason:
Here’s another, Jason:
Jjf,
Racist white liberals and black liberals colliding.
…and it is hilarious…you cannot see that in your ideological blindness.
Again, that’s not what “intersectional” means.
jjf,
2 victim group interests colliding. Unless you are arguing racist white liberals are not a victim group? We can negate that problem by saying some of the white liberal racists are probably gay, now they have achieved the top rung of victim status, despite being white and liberals racists.
Again, that’s not what “intersectional” means to the rest of the world
Jjf,
We will have to admit your are blind to the problem.
Hey Leroy, jjf just proved without an doubt that my first statement of “95 percent of the crap types into the form here by Jif and LeRoy prove that beyond all doubt.”
was actually low… he’s up to 98%.
Thanks to his statement on October 23, 2019 at 7:18 am “The politicians who said people can take babies home and kill them with impunity? Have you not been reading the news lately?”
Unassailable proof he does not understand context and nuance. Hey Leroy… sorry if you still can’t understand that. You not able to make sense of things is not a “me” problem. October 17, 2019 at 7:50 pm