This is a fight worth having both for the health of people and for the tax dollars spent.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funds from using them on certain candy and sugary drinks.
The bill directs the secretary of the Kansas Department of Children and Families to request a waiver from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees the program at the federal level, to exclude candy and soft drinks from SNAP benefits.
While we see this push coming from states (I think ten are moving the way of Kansas at the moment), we see a push at the federal level too. We also see an incredible push back.
It is beyond dispute that soda and candy are terrible for you. They are garbage calories that make you fat and sick. It is also beyond dispute that a free people should have the right to consume whatever they want – even if it is bad for you. We drink soda and eat candy because they are yummy, and that’s reason enough for a free people.
Opponents of restricting people from using their welfare to pay for soda and candy are arguing that it’s a freedom issue. We don’t want the government telling us what we can and cannot eat. Of course, this is the argument, but it is not the reason. Big Soda and Big Candy made a lot – A LOT – of money off of welfare recipients and they have orchestrated a well-funded campaign to preserve their revenue from the taxpayers.
But let’s take their argument at face value. First, this is not a case of government telling people what they can or cannot eat. This is a case of government telling people what taxpayers are willing or unwilling to pay for. If we ban the use of welfare for soda and candy, every welfare recipient is still free to purchase and consume those items just like people who are not receiving welfare. The difference is that they must now use their own money to buy it instead of the taxpayers’ money.
Second, the government already makes these distinctions. Today, welfare recipients may not spend their SNAP money on booze, fast food, cigarettes, vitamins, supplements, and any number of other things. This change would just add a couple of food categories to the list. I also think that we should add some things to the list of approved items. For example, grocery stores now offer many healthy prepared meal options that are prohibited. We should add those to the acceptable list. We still don’t want welfare to be used to buy dinner at Applebee’s or McDonald’s, but getting a rotisserie chicken or prepared meals from the grocery store should be fine.
The supporting argument for removing soda and candy from the acceptable list is twofold. First, they are terrible for you. Absolutely terrible. Taxpayers should not be paying for people to eat crap or feed their kids crap. It is impractical to prohibit all bad food and we don’t want the government to spend resources weighing in on the relative healthiness of eating habits from vegan to carnivore, but banning an entire category like soda is easy and helpful. Especially since the taxpayers also pay for the healthcare of many welfare recipients, the taxpayers have a moral and financial interest in helping them eat healthier.
Second, on principle, being on welfare shouldn’t be comfortable. We are a generous people and provide a robust safety net for those who fall on hard times and those who need a hand up. But that safety net is supposed to be temporary as people get on their own feet. We have spent a couple of generations destigmatizing welfare and ensuring that welfare recipients can enjoy a life as comfortable as those who are paying their own way. The result has been the advent of generational welfare families and a culture that sucks the productivity and dignity out of entire communities. To reverse this rot, we must make welfare uncomfortable again. People should WANT to work their way off of welfare so that they can enjoy the fruits of their own labor. People SHOULD feel some shame for living off the largesse of their neighbors instead of paying their own way. Being on welfare should not be seen as a way of life, yet that is exactly what it has become. Banning soda and candy would be a very small step toward reinvigorating our culture back to one of proud independence and self-reliance.
There should definitely be limitations on those. I remember a live lobster dinner for 2 or 4, bought at the original Sendiks many years ago and being sickened by it. It took up about 3/4 of that (I wanna say monthly?) check. Offhand, I don’t remember if it did happen or if Sendiks wouldn’t take it, but it was publicized.
However, I think we have to make prison less comfortable as well. The American Dream should not include a nice life in and out of our prisons or on indefinite welfare, but I would hit non-private prisons first.