Talking to local Minnesota outlet Kstp-tv on Thursday, the Minnesota governor admitted he was “a little surprised” by the election results.
“It felt like at the rallies, at the things I was going to, the shops I was going in, that the momentum was going our way, and it obviously wasn’t at the end,” Walz said.
“So yeah, I was a little surprised. I thought we had a positive message and I thought the country was ready for that,” he added.
and…
According to one senior adviser for the Harris campaign, internal polling never actually saw Harris defeating Trump.
Presumably the campaign’s internal polling was being shared with Walz, no? If it was, then why was he surprised? They never had a lead. Why would it be surprising that they lost.
Alternatively, if Walz was surprised, does that indicate that the bad internal polling was being held so closely that even the VP candidate was not told? Or did the campaign lie to Walz so that he thought they were going to win? Or did Walz see the internal polls and not believe him because of his anecdotal experiences and contrived campaign events?
Someone should try to dig a bit deeper on exactly how deep the fraud of the Harris campaign ran. Were they just lying to big donors and supporters or where they lying to themselves too?