Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...

Tag: West Bend School Board

School Board Votes Against Detachment

This is a bit of interesting policy that took place at the West Bend School Board meeting last night.

Not wishing to set a precedent, members of the West Bend School Board voted Monday night to deny a request by residents in the Strawberry Glen subdivision to detach from the district.

The subdivision is at the far southeast end of the district, north of Highway 60 in the town of Jackson, on the border of Washington and Ozaukee counties. Of the 44 families in the subdivision, 34 signed a petition asking for detachment in hopes of attaching to the Cedarburg School District.

Mike Shaw, who organized the petition, told the board during Monday’s public hearing that “staying in the West Bend School District results in our kids spending approximately 402 hours more on a bus over the course of their childhood.”

[…]

Shaw said of the 51 children in the subdivision, 40 of them want to attend the Cedarburg School District. The remaining 11 preferred to remain in the West Bend district.

[…]

The district would, however, feel a fiscal effect. It would lose more than $12 million in property taxes if Strawberry Glen was allowed to detach.

This is essentially a math problem. This subdivision is rather affluent and generates a lot of property taxes – more taxes than the cost of educating the kids in the subdivision. If they go to the Cedarburg district, it will cost the district. Even if the 40 kids that they say want to go to Cedarburg do so through open enrollment, it’s still a cash positive arrangement for the West Bend School District.

This does highlight something that I’ve been discussing for years. Many people have been critical of the West Bend School District because it has been losing more kids through open enrollment than it has been taking in. They characterize this as a indicator that the quality of the district has declined to where families are opting out. But the exit interviews and anecdotal information about the families who choose open enrollment to leave the district indicate that the most common reason is that a neighboring district is more convenient for the family.

The West Bend School District is a geographically large district. As such, some families on the edges of the district find it more convenient to go to the schools that are closer to them – even if those schools are in a neighboring district. That’s the case here. Many folks in the Strawberry Glen subdivision find it more convenient and in sync with their lives to send their kids to Cedarburg than West Bend.

Perhaps it is time to consider shrinking the geographic footprint of the West Bend School District. The far flung district made more sense when the population of Washington County was smaller, but as population centers shift, maybe it doesn’t make as much sense as it used to.

Clear Choices for West Bend School Board

My column for the West Bend Daily News is online. Please note that there is a factual error in the column. I identified Kris Beaver as the treasurer for Tiffany Larson when, in fact, he is the treasurer for Jenn Donath. I rearranged the column a couple of times before sending it in and that fact got mixed up. That’s the explanation, but it’s no excuse. I apologize to Tiffany Larson for the error.

Here it is:

There are five candidates running for two seats on the West Bend School Board this spring. On Feb. 16, the voters will narrow the field to four candidates, with the two winners being elected April 5. Voters in the school district are fortunate to have a relatively varied group of candidates.

Before we whittle down our choices, each of the candidates deserves a hearty “thank you” for being willing to serve on the school board. Though not without rewards, serving on a school board is a time-consuming, frustrating and often thankless job. Those who are willing to step up in service to their community are to be commended, even if they do not win the opportunity to do so. I enjoyed meeting with each of the candidates and hearing their passion for our school district.

As the only incumbent on the ballot, Randy Marquardt knows full well what public service entails. Marquardt has been a member of the School Board since 2010 and currently serves as the board president. Marquardt’s leadership has been commendable. Under his leadership, the West Bend School District has opened an on-site clinic for staff and teachers that has helped control the district’s health care costs while providing a popular service for the district’s employees.

During Marquardt’s tenure, the district has also opened the Pathways Charter School, started a 4K program, expanded Silverbrook Intermediate School, expanded vocational offerings and much more. Perhaps most impressive is the news we no longer hear. When Marquardt first ran for School Board, the district’s facilities were in a constant state of crisis due to previous board decisions to defer major maintenance needs. These recurring crises prompted multiple referendum requests that drove community division. Marquardt ran on a promise to address the district’s facilities issues and has delivered on that promise. Maintenance is no longer being deferred and the district is even setting aside money every year for the eventual replacement of Jackson Elementary without need for another referendum.

Marquardt’s consistent conservative leadership has earned him another term on the school board.

The remaining four candidates are running for School Board for the first time. Jenn Donath is a lecturer at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh and frequent parent volunteer at McLane Elementary. Donath is a member of the steering committee for the recently formed Benders for Better Public Education group. She considers teacher morale and poor communication to be some of the biggest issues in the district. Donath proudly defends her decision to sign the petition to recall Gov. Scott Walker and ardently opposes School Choice. Donath’s views on education and the district’s priorities stray too far from my own to earn my vote.

Tiffany Larson was compelled to run for the School Board after her husband, Ron Larson, was not selected for the East girls basketball varsity coaching job he wanted last year. In the wake of that decision, Ron Larson resigned as West Bend East’s junior varsity boys basketball coach and Booster Club president — presumably in protest. Tiffany Larson considers the hiring process to be a symptom of a flawed decision-making process by the district’s administration that opened a crack in the door for her School Board candidacy.

Like Donath, Larson considers the most pressing issues in the district to be teacher morale and a failure of the district’s leadership to address that morale. She is heavily supported by the Benders for Better Public Education group and other prominent liberals in the community — including the liberal former board member Kris Beaver, who serves as her campaign’s treasurer. As with Donath, Larson is too liberal to earn my vote.

The final two candidates offer a conservative choice for voters but come from different perspectives. Bob Miller is a 1995 graduate of West Bend West with kids in the district. As selfprofessed band geek who loves driving the bus for West Bend’s band, Miller’s priority is to keep the district moving in the positive direction of the past few years. He supports a diversified educational offering, including technical and mechanical opportunities, and wants to bring social workers back into the district by reprioritizing spending.

Ken Schmidt is a 36-year resident of the district and husband of a public school teacher. With a Masters in Social Work from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and 27 years as a member of the Board of Regents for Bethany Lutheran College, Schmidt’s priorities are to improve educational outcomes through a systematic review of the curriculum programs and testing regimens utilized by the district, continue to put away money for future building needs, and encourage parent and employee input. Schmidt believes in being a good steward of the taxpayers’ dollars and first became active with the school district because of concerns for the financial management of the district.

While Miller and Schmidt are both solid conservative choices, my second vote will go to Schmidt. His greater experience with oversight of an educational institution and focus on fiscal discipline tipped the scale for me.

The only other election on the ballot for most people in the West Bend School District is the primary for Supreme Court Justice, in which incumbent Justice Rebecca Bradley is the clear conservative choice. In-person absentee voting is available until Friday. Please take a few minutes and vote to keep the West Bend School Board moving in the right direction.

Kids in the District?

Tomorrow my column will run regarding the election for the West Bend School Board. Before it goes up, I have to get this off my chest because it’s been bugging me for a couple of weeks now. Here is a question and the candidates’ answers from the forum hosted by Concerned Citizens as recorded on Washington County Insider:

Q, is it important for public school board members to enroll their own students in the district?
a) TL, absolutely, you can best represent everyone
b) RM, it depends, if you want to send your student to parochial, then that shouldn’t preclude you from running
c) BM, yes they should be in the district
d) KS, can go both ways. Yes, it can be an advantage, but if they’re not, there could be richness of experience that is brought to the board
e) JD, prefer yes students in the district, it shows you believe in the product, you are more invested.

In preparation for my column, I met with each of the candidates and asked them all about their response. Unfortunately, due to space limitations, none of it made it into the column. The notion that school board members’ kids must attend the district’s schools betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of the school board.

A public school district is an institution of the community for the benefit of the entire community. This is why we all pay taxes to support it despite the fact that most of the people in the community do not have kids attending the schools. We all support the local public school district because everyone in the community benefits from the education provided.

The school board is the community’s oversight organ of their school district. It is supposed to provide direction and oversight of the school district on behalf of the community who elect the school board members. The school board exists to represent the community. It is not an advocacy organization for the students, teachers, parents, administration, or any specific stakeholder group. As such, it is perfectly right and proper for school board members to come from all slices of the community including retirees whose kids are grown, people without any kids, people with kids in private school, people who home school their kids, and yes, people with kids in the district. The ideal school board has a diverse group of people representing the diversity of the community.

To say that school board members should put their kids in the district to demonstrate that they have “skin in the game” is insulting and wrong.

It Ain’t All Bad

A supporter of the West Bend School District penned a defense for the West Bend Daily News

Critics ignore the positives of West Bend School District

Not long ago, the West Bend School District had overcrowded classrooms, classrooms in trailers, deferred maintenance and buildings not handicapaccessible. With the exception of Jackson Elementary, additions and renovations resulted in buildings conducive to today’s educational programs. A 25-year plan exists to schedule district maintenance and construction of a new school in Jackson.

Not long ago, the district was making program cuts. Today, there are new offerings and options for students, including 4K.

Recently released test scores are good. Scores in areas where improvement is needed are comparable to those in other Washington County districts.

The School Board is diverse and members who disagree on issues listen to each other and are respectful of each other.

With the above positives, why are loud voices critical of the Board and Superintendent Ted Neitzke? Why are these voices reluctant to acknowledge district accomplishments?

They oppose every board action, including changes to improve student outcomes. Issues go through committees whose meetings are open to the public, and then taken up at regular meetings where the public can speak on agenda items.

The loud voices claim a lack of teacher input, and that teachers fear retribution if they express their opinion. The board is comprised of seven people who ran for election and whose membership usually changes slightly with each annual election. Do you think these board members conspire to intimidate the teaching staff, or would tolerate such behavior by administrators?

The disrespect heaped on the board and superintendent stem from their anger over the passage of Act 10 and the changes that have resulted.

A primary election is Feb. 16. Early voting has begun. When considering your choice of School Board candidates, please take into consideration the positive aspects of the district, and don’t be swayed by the negative voices. Please vote.

Kathleen Meindl West Bend

West Bend School Board Forum Tomorrow

If you can make it, be sure to attend the forum for the West Bend School Board candidates tomorrow at the Moose Lodge in West Bend. The forum starts at 7 PM and is hosted by Common Sense Citizens of Washington County. As I understand it, the format will be for the candidates to field questions from the audience with Chris Jenkins (CSC president and West Bend Alderman) moderating. Given the limits of time and space, I’d recommend getting there early if you want to get your question in.

On a side note, don’t waste everyone’s time with a stupid question ;)

West Bend School Board Candidate Forum

Common Sense Citizens of Washington County are hosting a candidate forum next Wednesday at 7 PM at the West Bend Moose Lodge. It looks like all 5 candidates are going to attend. They candidates are Randy Marquardt (inc), Jenn Donath, Tiffany Larson, Robert Miller, and Ken Schmidt.

The primary election is on February 16th in which the voters will narrow the field to four candidates. The general election is on April 5th in which the voters will choose two board members.

I believe this is the first forum with all of the candidates. I don’t know the format, but with all of the recent goings on in the district, it should be interesting. If CSC finds a way to live stream the forum, I’ll pass it along.

Controversy Brewing in West Bend School District

There is another controversy brewing in the West Bend School District, but it is difficult to discern how much of a controversy it is yet. Here’s a primer:

Last year the school district implemented a new assessment system called Galileo. Previously they used another system, but this one allows for more online use and has some other features. Also, it saves the district about $62k/year compared to the previous system. Here’s the email the district sent out yesterday with some explanation.

The teachers union and some of the teachers oppose the use of Galileo. They complain about some of the mechanics of Galileo, but those complaints would apply to any assessment system. The root of the agitation seems to be the fact that the results from assessments will be used for a part of the teacher evaluations.

As part of their opposition, union officials were circulating a petition in the schools opposing Galileo. You can read the petition here. So far, it’s all fine and good. The administration implemented a new system. Generally speaking, people don’t like change and, in this case, unions don’t like objective assessments being used to determine teacher performance. So there was ongoing discussion happening.

Then, something went sideways to escalate the situation. In discussions with the principal – presumably about the petition – Tanya Lohr was put on paid administrative leave. Lohr is a teacher and a long time liberal activist in the district. According to the union, she was speaking with the principal in her role as a union official – not as a teacher.

That’s really all we know about that. The union is saying that Lohr was unjustly put on leave to silence her or intimidate teachers into silence for opposing Galileo. The district, of course, can’t give their side of the story because it is a personnel issue. The very procedures and secrecy that the union demands forbids the district from commenting. So take what the union is saying with a grain of salt.

We do know that Lohr has a history of aggressively advocating her opinions regarding the functioning of the schools and has run afoul of the administration in the past. We do not know if she was already on a performance plan or violated any previous agreements with the district regarding her behavior. We also know that because of Lohr’s previous work history and knowing the inevitable backlash that would occur, it is exceedingly unlikely that the district would have put her on administrative leave without substantial cause.

Lohr’s disciplinary action has precipitated a response from many parents, teachers, and the union – particularly since it comes on the eve of finals.

That’s the story, but more questions remain. The cynic in me has me very suspicious about the timing of all of this. Things like this do not happen in a vacuum. The filing deadline for the West Bend School Board was the day before Lohr was put on leave. There are two seats up for election and five candidates on the ballot. One incumbent, the school board President, Randy Marquardt, is running for reelection. He is a conservative and leads the slim conservative majority on the board.

How convenient is it that this “crisis” has been precipitated and the teachers agitated on the eve of a school board election that could oust the conservative board president and tip the majority to the liberals? The answer is “very.” In fact, Waring Fincke, our local socialist agitator and Democratic Party official, started using this as a political wedge for the election within hours. And the commenters have done us the courtesy of pointing out the candidates who they believe will advocate their pro-union views:

candidates

 

As I said at the beginning, it is difficult to tell how much of a controversy this all really is. It could range anywhere from a tyrannical administration foisting a flawed assessment system on teachers and acting egregiously to quash their opposition to a completely fictional crisis manufactured by the union and a few activists to agitate the electorate before a school board election. I’m leaning to the latter part of that spectrum of possibilities.

Update From the West Bend School District Meeting

I didn’t make it to the annual meeting of the West Bend School Board, but Judy Steffes was there and has some updates. It looks like I missed a lively meeting! Here are a few highlights from Steffes’ report:

– As expected, some folks turned up to push for more spending and for 4K.

– The board ended up voting to keep their pay the same and not increase it after opposition from the audience.

– The board voted to approve the levy increase.

Steffes has a lot more detail and pictures if you want to check it out.

West Bend School Board Results In

This is an interesting result. One incumbent out; one in.

West Bend School Board (2 seats)

100% reporting
Name Votes Vote %
Monte Schmiege 3,696 36%
Therese M. Sizer (inc) 3,346 32%
Vinney Pheng (inc) 3,259 32%

What this shows is the value of campaigning. Schmiege was the only candidate who really got out there and campaigned and the results show it. Also, he campaigned as a strong conservative and was rewarded in this conservative district. He’ll do a great job on the board. Congratulations to both of the winners and a heartfelt “thank you” to Vinney Pheng for his service.

 

Archives

Categories

Pin It on Pinterest