Boots & Sabers

The blogging will continue until morale improves...

Tag: West Bend School District

West Bend School Superintendent Apologizes for Firing

You don’t see this very often. This is a followup in the West Bend Daily News to the firing of Don Gruber a few weeks ago.

By NICHOLAS DETTMANN

Daily News

Former West Bend East girls basketball coach Don Gruber was offered his position back after a grievance meeting with West Bend School District Superintendent Ted Neitzke and Chief Operations Officer Valley Elliehausen.

Gruber declined the offer, upset the school administration would jeopardize the eligibility of its students.

On Monday, West Bend School District Superintendent Ted Neitzke issued an apology to East girls basketball players, parents and coaches at the School Board meeting for the way the situation was handled.

[…]

Neitzke said after Monday’s meeting he wouldn’t comment on whether there will be any disciplinary action for Hansen or others involved.

“We did the right thing; we did the process in the wrong order,” Neitzke said.

What actually happened here is still murky. What we know is that Gruber was fired for unstated reasons but it was presumed that it was because of his team’s poor winning record; he filed a grievance; he was offered his job back but refused because of the conditions offered; and now the superintendent is publicly apologizing. Clearly, something was seriously amiss with the firing.

 

 

Fired Coach Files Grievance

There’s an interesting little story brewing in West Bend. Before we get to the actual story, let’s review the context of how it came about.

Despite being a fairly large district, West Bend’s high schools have struggled in competitive sports. They do well in a few areas, but many citizens think that the high schools should be more competitive in sports given the pool of students in the community. Many people attribute the lack of competitiveness to the fact that West Bend has two high schools. (For those who are uninitiated, West Bend has two high schools, East and West, that share the same building. They are divided for organizational purposes, but it is the same facility.) If West Bend combined the high schools, they argued, it would mean a larger pool of athletes for each sport which would lead to better teams. So the argument went…

There was a push last year to combine the high schools with this argument being used as one of the justifications. Since the academics of the two high schools are already almost completely combined, why not fully combine the schools and create one of the biggest high schools in the state with the stable of athletes to compete with the best?

After a lot of heated debate, the decision was made to keep the high schools separate, but as a concession to those who voiced concerns over the lack of competitiveness in sports, the school district created an Athletic Engagement Task Force to review the athletic programs with an eye to improving their competitiveness.

Enter Don Gruber. Gruber was the West Bend East’s girls varsity basketball coach. He had been the coach for 6 seasons and had an overall record of 54-87. Last season, the team really struggled with a record of 3-20. By every account I have read, he was a good coach, a good man, and was well liked by the parents and the students. They just didn’t win very much.

On the same day that the task force gave the board  its recommendations, Gruber was fired. As a personnel issue, the district isn’t giving any specific reasons for his firing and nobody is saying much, but Gruber did file a grievance with the district’s HR department over the firing. It’s not over.

It does bring up the whole discussion of what do we want from our coaches? I don’t know Gruber or his coaching acumen, but many of his former students and their parents have been very praiseworthy of him. In contrast, I haven’t seen anybody saying that he was a bad egg. His team just didn’t win very much.

So what do we want from our coaches? Is the win/loss record the most important thing? He could be the greatest coach ever and just didn’t have good enough girls on the team. Should he be fired for that? Perhaps he was exceptional at developing young minds, attitudes, and bodies, but just a crummy game-time coach? Should that get him fired? What’s most important? But if we, as a community, are going to gripe about win/loss records and championships, can we find fault with an athletic director who is trying to replace coaches who don’t produce winning seasons?

What seems apparent is that Don Gruber lost his job because the community wants championships but was unwilling to combine the high schools to make them more attainable. My gut tells me that this is a reactionary firing, but the roots of it are in the community.

GSA Letter to West Bend Committee

I wrote a few days ago about the West Bend GSA complaining to the school district’s Human Growth and Development Advisory Committee about the lack of student representation on the committee. This was funny because there are actually already three student representatives on the committee, so the GSA’s complaint was completely baseless. A little homework on their part would have gone a long way…

Since then, a kind reader sent me a copy of the entire letter. Here is the full thing. Two things stuck out to me – besides their complete misfire about student representation. First, some of the things they are advocating be taught to high schoolers are more about teaching them how to have sex – not teaching them to be safe about it if they do. For example, explaining about lubrication, sex for pleasure, and a laundry list of different kinds of sex acts have little to do with keeping kids safe.

The second thing that caught my eye was the tone of the letter. It is haughty, accusatory, and insulting to opposing viewpoints. It looks exactly like it was written by some teenagers. While it would be fine for a first draft, I would have thought that the faculty adviser would have taken the opportunity to help them craft their concerns into an appropriate communication for a government committee. You know… one that would have the best chance of getting their concerns addressed. But no… instead it is a childish letter written about a very serious subject. It’s a shame, really. These kids missed out on an educational opportunity.

West Bend GSA Group Fires Blanks

This is kind of funny. The West Bend School District has a formed a Human Growth and Development Advisory Committee to revamp the sex education curriculum for the district. The committee is formed from representatives from the various stakeholders in the district. It’s a tough job on such a sensitive and controversial subject, but it appears that they have been working fairly well so far.

The school district’s Gay Straight Alliance (GSA) filed a complaint with the chairman of the committee. Most of the letter is a lengthy history of how the GSA feels they have been wronged in the past, but the heart of their complaint is that they assert that the committee doesn’t have any student representation as required by statute. According to the Daily News, the GSA says, “The Legislature clearly understood that input from the student body was both appropriate and necessary… Given the district’s record of mistreatment of the GSA, we suggest that the WBSD consider appointment of a student member of the GSA to this committee.” It continues, “In any event, we would assume that the committee is statutorily unable to proceed unless and until this oversight is cured.”

There’s one problem… the committee already has student representation Three representatives, actually. They just haven’t been showing up at the meetings. The chairman of the committee tells the paper, ““We do have two student representatives designated from the high schools and one from the middle school, but they have not been present.”

Done. The GSA’s complaint is moot. Moving on…

West Bend Students Protest New Hall Pass Policy

There was a bit of a kerfuffle at the West Bend High Schools today that resulted in a soft lock down for a little bit. You can read the details here and see an interview with the superintendent here.

The new hall pass policy requires kids to wear a visible hall pass on a lanyard around their necks instead of the old paper slip of the past. This has apparently upset some kids and their parents. Why? No idea. It makes sense to me so that staff can easily see if a kid wandering the hall has a pass permitting him or her to do so. In protest, some kids refused to return to class after a meeting about the new policy and ran down the halls doing some minor damage.

It seems to me that the policy is fairly sensible and that some kids got wrapped up in indignation over a lot of nothing. It happens.

 

West Bend School Taxes Going Down

This is good to see.

School District Superintendent Ted Neitzke said the tax levy and mill rate will be finalized by the School Board at its meeting Monday night.

“The mill rate will be going down by 54 cents per thousand of assessed value,” Neitzke said. “When there is a reduction in taxes it’s a victory for everybody.”

According to the district’s Director of Finance and Support Services Brittany Altendorf the 2014-15 tax levy for the school district will be $36.6 million. That figure is $1.6 million, or 4.21 percent less than the previous year.

Reflecting on the West Bend School Board’s Decision

Now that we have had a little time to cool off since the Great Two-School Kerfuffle at the West Bend School Board, I am pretty pleased with the whole episode. It was a case of representative government actually working correctly.

To review, here’s what happened… a school board member wanted the board to consider the idea of combining West Bend’s two high schools, which occupy the same building, into one high school. The school board went through a process to inform the public of the pros and cons of combining the schools and gather public input. They held information sessions, allowed public input at a school board meeting, conducted a survey, put information on the web site and snail mail, and invited public input in the form of citizens contacting the school board members.

In the end, despite the indication that several of the school board members had leaned toward combining the schools, they voted unanimously for the status quo of two high schools. Without an overly compelling reason to change the high school configuration and with the lopsided public input in favor of keeping two schools, the school board followed the wishes of the citizens.

Representative government worked.

Despite the fact that I was in favor of combining the high schools, I am happy to see that the school board engaged in a rational decision-making process that worked to enact the wishes of the majority of the citizens who chose to speak up. There are times when the evidence is overwhelming that a government should take an action against the public’s will, but those situations are rare. In this case, there were valid arguments on both sides of the issue and the board went with public opinion.

Good.

West Bend School Board Meeting Recap

The big meeting of the West Bend School Board was tonight to decide on whether or not to combine the high schools. Fortunately, Judy Steffes was there! Here’s her report:

WB School Board votes to maintain two high school configuration.

Following a recommendation by Superintendent Ted Neitzke, the West Bend School Board voted unanimously to maintain the two high school configuration.

The board also voted to approve spending $40,000 to paint the field house in school colors and the hallways to represent the individual East High School and West High School.

Couple of tidbits from the two-hour meeting.

–          About 100 people in attendance.  Thirteen people signed up to speak and all were in favor of two schools except for one.

–          Local attorney Amy Salberg spoke to the board about a need to set up a better procedure to discuss the issues. She said, “a lot of people did not trust the procedure.”

–          A man named Joe told the board to “listen to the community – open your eyes to the turmoil you’re causing.” He then quoted the school motto “where children come first” and he said, “When do children figure in to this decision.”

–          Former WBHS coach and English teacher Rick Riehl said he spoke to four board members “with a cranium full of research and a gut full of apprehension.” He told the board, “The number-one goal is let’s see if we can trust each other and become a team. West Bend East and West Bend West on behalf of our kids.”

–          Joseph Garrison of Jackson said after the vote he was “disappointed because it was all based on emotionalism” and “there’s no solid reason to keep the schools separate.”

–          Local business owner Mary Husar Martin said, “Do what the community has asked. No more money or time spent on this issue. I’d rather see you as a board and us as a community work on why students are leaving, teachers are leaving, and why we have declining test scores. Work to make West Bend a district of academics, arts and athletics.”

 

Superintendent addressed the board and talked about developing a policy to define the process to review the high schools configuration. Some of the suggestions include crating a task force, developing a survey from focus groups, and reviewing athletic metrics.

The board will review language in Policy 432 which deals with how it’s determined which West Bend High School a student attends.

Overall comment from board members:

Ryan Gieryn, “This discussion has been good for our community. Why are we settling for mediocrity in athletics?”

Vinny Pang, “This was not a courageous decision, it was a no brainer.”

Bart Williams, “Let’s keep what we have because it works.”

After the decision people in the audience stood and applauded.

Having not been there, what’s the deal with deciding to spend $40k for painting? Is it in need of painting or is this just stupid pandering to the two schools crowd? Things like painting are usually done in the normal course of maintenance. Why are we spending $40k in unbudgeted money on this?

West Bend Superintendent to Recommend Keeping Two High Schools

Report from Judy Steffes.

West Bend superintendent Ted Neitzke presented a thick packet of papers prior to releasing his recommendations on the one school – two school proposal.

Ted’s recommendations will be voted on by the school board at the Monday, Oct. 6 meeting. The board will make the final decision.

-Maintain our two high school configuration
-Develop Board Policy to define the process for reviewing the high schools configuration and guide future School Boards and Superintendents
-Revise language in Policy 432 that would allow for an element of school choice at the high school with priority given to the children of alumnus
-Create an Athletic Engagement Task Force
-Paint the town Maroon/Gold and Blue/White

Also spend $40,000 from fund balance to cover the costs of painting the field house and main hallway that connects East and West.

Input given to board:
4 focus groups with 2,300 survey results  74.1 percent = 2 high schools,  22 percent = 1 high school  3.8 percent – no preference

UPDATE: Here’s a link to the survey results and superintendent’s report. Here’s the gist of it:

2schoolsor1

 

Combine West Bend’s High Schools?

I attended a good chunk of the West Bend School Board meeting this evening where they discussed the prospect of combining the two high schools into one. This was the meeting that allowed for public input.

There were about 200 people at the meeting. They were overwhelmingly for two schools. Of those who spoke, 37 spoke in favor of two schools; two spoke in favor of combining the schools; and two spoke without expressing an opinion either way. Interestingly, this issue does not break counterdown on conservative vs. liberal lines. It breaks more along the lines of alumni vs. not. Those who went to one of the West Bend high schools or are involved in them (teachers, coaches, parents, etc.) lean way in favor of the status quo. Those who are less personally involved lean toward combining the schools. The passion is clearly on the side of those who wish to keep the status quo, which makes sense since they have an emotional stake in the decision.

After the public comment, the board members had their say on the discussion. I was not able to stay around for all of that. I’m afraid that two hours of school board meeting during Monday Night Football is my limit, but Rick Parks had the most insightful thing to say. Parks was the one who initiated the conversation by bringing it up for the board to consider. That is his prerogative as a school board member. He spoke about the process, the role of the board, the need to avoid conspiracy theories, and the points both for and against having two high schools in one building. He said that based on the feedback during the meeting and in other forums that he believes that the result is a “foregone conclusion.”

Based on what I heard, I’d be shocked if the school board ended up voting for combining the schools. It was clear that if they do so they will face a passionate opposition the next time they run for election. And, for better or worse, the public made it pretty clear that they support two schools. It is impossible to tell if the two schoolers are the majority from a meeting like that, but they are certainly the ones willing to show up and voice their opinions. That’s how a representative government works.

One side note… several people expressed the belief that combining the schools would lead to fewer athletic opportunities which would in turn lead to more kids using drugs and engaging in crime. Even the District Attorney of Washington County, Mark Bensen, spoke in favor of two schools saying that very few of the people his office prosecutes are members of high school sports teams. The argument is a bit specious, in my opinion, but it is clear that there is a deep concern about the rise of drug use and crime in the schools. Rightfully so.

 

West Bend School Board Meeting Regarding High Schools

Heads up. The question about combining the high schools will be on the agenda for the West Bend School Board tomorrow night. If you want to share your views with the board, show up and be heard! Note the rules for speaking below.

The School Board meeting on Monday, September 22, 2014 will be held at 6:30 p.m. in the BADGER MIDDLE SCHOOL cafeteria.District residents are welcome to attend and address the Board of Education on any agenda item following the process for public participation as outlined in Board Policy 187, which includes:

  • District residents who wish to address the Board must register by completing a comment card prior to the Board meeting. Comment cards and agendas are available at the entrance of the Board meeting.

  • Completed comment cards must be turned in to the Board president before the official start of the Board meeting at 6:30 p.m.

  • Each District resident wishing to speak will have up to two minutes to address the Board. 

High school or high schools?

My weekly column for the Daily News is up. It’s a purely West Bend issue.

High school or high schools?

Combining West Bend’s East and West is the sensible option

Almost since the inception of West Bend’s two high schools was established on one campus in 1970, there has been a push to combine them into a single school. That debate is upon us again. The West Bend School Board is considering the issue again and is tentatively planning to make the decision at its Oct. 6 meeting.

The reasons for putting two high schools in a single campus in 1970 were sensible. It was designed to allow for modular scheduling and the more personal feel of a smaller school while taking advantages of the efficiencies of sharing facilities.

Over time, the inevitable melding of the two schools has happened. In order to ensure a consistent education for all of West Bend’s kids, the education departments have been merged. The administrations have been combined under a single principal. There is one band. One drama department. One choir. At this point, the only thing that is still separate and distinct is the athletic departments.

In making a decision like this, the arguments boil down to three major points. First, will combining the schools improve or detract from the education of the children? Given that everything except athletics are already combined, it appears that the quality of education will be unaffected either way. It is a neutral outcome.

Second, will combining the schools be more or less costly for the taxpayers? The projections are that it will cost a one-time charge of about $150,000 to change the school’s branding and purchase new uniforms if the schools are combined. Ongoing, however, it would save about $200,000 per year mostly from the reduction in the number of athletic staff required. The school district administration is strongly recommending that any savings be plowed back into the athletic department, but that is a choice for the school board. The savings are there to be had.

In addition, there are already unmet needs accumulating in the athletic department that will require additional funding in years to come. Combining the schools would provide some funding for those needs without asking the taxpayers for more money.

At this point, it looks like combining the schools will provide the same education for less money. That is an easy decision to make.

Before making a change like this, however, the third question to ask it, why change? The two-school system has been successful for 44 years. There are generations of alumni who have a history and pride in being a Sun or a Trojan. These are not factors to be ignored.

The reasons to change are as sensible as the reasons were for having two high schools in the first place. Combining the schools would save the taxpayers money while not harming education. In addition, the revamped athletics department would have more funds available to maintain facilities and possibly offer more athletic opportunities like lacrosse or men’s volleyball. There is some speculation that the combined schools may also be able to field more competitive teams that might bring home some championships, but that is for the future to tell.

As for the history and tradition of the Suns and Spartans, it is a legacy worth honoring, but it is no reason to impede progress. Schools are combined, split, opened, and closed all of the time. The perception is that it will be traumatic, and it is at the time, but the space of a little time reveals that the pain is fleeting and quickly heals. The generation that attended high school as a West Bend Badger can attest to that. Should the School Board combine the high schools, there will be just as much pride and support for the one high school as there was for the two.

All things considered, the most sensible course of action is to combine the high schools.

Irrespective of the decision eventually reached, it is also worth evaluating the process. Some have complained that the school board is rushing to judgment with an arbitrary Oct. 6 decision date. The reason for the October date is simple. If the decision is made to combine the high schools, the planning to implement it next year will take some time. Of course, there is no reason that the decision cannot be delayed another year. No harm would be done in waiting to allow more time for public input.

At the same time, there is little to be gained in waiting. This is an issue that has been debated and vetted for literally generations of Benders. It is exceedingly unlikely that any new arguments or any new information will be advanced in six months as opposed to one month. West Bend would be better served by going ahead and making a decision one way or the other instead of dragging it out for months on end.

There are four scheduled feedback sessions, a couple of School Board meetings, and about three weeks in which to call or write the School Board members before Oct. 6. Make use of them.

(Owen Robinson’s column runs Tuesdays in the Daily News.)

 

West Bend School Board Work Session About Combining High Schools

I attended the work session of the West Bend School Board this evening. The topic of conversation was the possibility of combining West Bend’s two high schools into one. There were about 20 other people attending. The work session does not allow for public input, so it was just the board members and school staff speaking.

The stated objective of the meeting was not to debate the issue itself, but to establish a process for making a decision. Of course, some discussion about the issue itself did occur, but I’ll get to that in a little bit.

The process will be as follow:

  • There will be four structured listening sessions. As I understand it, the format for these will be for the administration to present the facts and options under consideration. After that, the attendees will break out into small discussion groups and provide written survey responses at the end. They have used this format before. The four listening sessions will be:

September 16th – 6:30 pm – Silverbrook

September 17th – 7:30 am – School Board Room

September 25th – 7:30 am – School Board Room

September 29th – 6:30 pm – Silverbrook

  • Public feedback about the issue will be heard at the regularly scheduled board meeting on September 22nd.
  • The board plans to debate and vote on the issue at the October 6th meeting.
  • An online survey will be released shortly. It will ask for some demographic information, one’s opinion on the issue, and will be restricted to one submission per IP address.
  • Postcards will go out to district residents at the end of the week with some information about the process.
  • Source information with facts relevant to the decision will be placed on the district’s website.

The board will present three options for the public to consider.

Option 1: Status Quo

The status quo is… the status quo. The district has already sought a change in conferences. They are looking to compete with schools closer to home. The district is also struggling to find funding to support the needs of athletics, so if this option is chosen the board will have to consider how to provide more resources.

Option 2: Choice

This is admittedly an option that had not been floated before. Essentially, it would be to offer some choice between the high schools.

Right now, residents do not have a choice of which high school they attend. It is determined by the birthday of the oldest kid in the family. School staff members can choose, but not the general public.

This option would offer some choice. 100 8th graders would be allowed to choose which high school they want. Kids after the 100 would be chosen via a lottery instead of by birthday. The choice would be just for the kid and not all of his or her siblings too.

Over time, this could lead to one high school being bigger than the other with each school providing a different educational experience.

Option 3: One High School

This option would be to combine the high schools. If this is done, it would start in the 2015/2016 school year. The athletic staff configuration would be determined in December with all positions posted. The consolidation of athletics would allow for the consideration of addition more sports like lacrosse, cycling, and men’s volleyball.

The consolidation of the high school athletic programs would save an estimated $200,000 per year. It would cost a one time amount of about $150,000 to change the branding and buy new uniforms, etc. The superintendent emphasized that the savings to be had by this option would be retained in the athletics budget to pay for some needs there.

 

The Debate

The limited amount of debate on the issues were driven primarily by Bart Williams who expressed several arguments against combining the high schools and the process.

It was made clear that the decision to combine the high schools or not is almost completely an athletic one. The academic areas of the schools are already combined. So are things lime the band, theater, choir, etc. The only things that are separated are the sports teams. All of the savings to be had by combining the schools would come from reducing the number of coaches and staff needed to support two of every team.

Bart Williams brought up at the meeting that consideration should also be given to 45 years of tradition and alumni that are also separate.

There was also a lot of debate about the process. There is less than a month until the board is trying to make a decision and there is debate as to whether or not that is enough time for community education and input. Also, there was debate as to whether or not the board should hold an advisory referendum before taking a vote. Bart Williams expressed concerns that the decision was being rushed or rammed through.

My Thoughts

First about the process… I think the process is fine. It feels a little cramped, but the reality is that this issue has been debated for decades. I doubt that any new arguments can be offered if we wait another year for input. In the end, it will always be a board decision. Any referendum would only be advisory. The survey and community sessions will provide ample feedback for the board to consider. I suspect that it will show what it has shown for years – the community is divided on this issue. And then the board members will have to make a decision one way or another. Personally, although the survey is open to more fraud voting than an actual referendum, it will also provide a lot more information about who wants what. That input should be more valuable for the board to consider.

On the issue itself, let’s look at the options. The option for choice is rather silly to me. It introduces an arbitrary limit of 100 kids and doesn’t really solve or do anything – other than give 100 kids a choice every year. It introduces a lot more problems where coaches and staff will be enticed to recruit, community strife when the 101st kid doesn’t get the choice he or she wants, and a shifting imbalance between the schools. Let’s take that one off the table.

Between the other two choices, my decision matrix is this:

DecisionMatrix

 

 

As you can see, I don’t put a lot of weight in the alumni/tradition/school pride thing. Perhaps it is because I’ve been through this. When I was a senior in High School my hometown split into two. Sure, there was a little consternation about the split, but students were more concerned about having a closed campus for lunch. Over 20+ years later, I couldn’t care less. Public schools are utilitarian and the brief wounds of pride that occur when schools open or close heal quickly, and are forgotten soon.

So it appears that combining the schools will not affect education at all. The educational areas of the school are already combined and won’t be affected. In athletics, it appears that combining the schools will allow the school to offer a greater variety of sports that will give kids more options.

On the financial side, combining the schools is clearly a savings. The administration is recommending that the saving be plowed back into the athletics budget and that may be the most prudent course. Still, the savings are there and it is up to the board to decide what to do with them.

We will see what other information may come out in the next month, but none of the information presented to date has changed since we seriously debated this the last time in 2007 or so. I’m leaning toward combining the high schools.

Let the debate begin.

West Bend Considers Combining High Schools

Here we go again… for those who are not from West Bend, we have two high schools – East and West – but both high schools are in the same building. Yes, I know… it’s strange.

The high schools opened in 1970 with the combined campus in an effort to create a smaller environments with more modular scheduling. Since the high schools are in the same building, the district determines which school a kid goes to by their birthday. Even birthdays go to one school and odd birthdays go to the same school. If there are multiple kids in the family, it goes by the birthday of the oldest kid.

Over the years there have been several efforts to combine the schools, but they have each been thwarted for various reasons. Mainly, it appears that nostalgia for the alumni is the strongest impediment to combining the schools. Practically speaking, the two schools already have the same principal, combined academic departments, and little adherence to physical separation within the building. The sports teams, however, are separate.

I am the epitome of the dispassionate observer on this issue. I didn’t go to West Bend’s schools and neither do my kids. I want them to be strong and provide a quality education at the lowest possible cost. If combining the schools saves money while not harming education (or even improving it), then do it. If it would cost more to combine them or would harm education, then leave it alone.

The School Board is going to be working on this over the next month. They plan to have some open forums and make a decision at their October 6th meeting. They get started tomorrow evening at a work session. It’s September 8th at 5:30 in the district office. I don’t think they are taking public input at this meeting, but you can hear what the board members have to say.

Archives

Categories

Pin It on Pinterest